Model choice with governance and cost control.
Route by mission risk. Fallback on provider outage. Pin model versions. Cap cost per mission. Evaluate continuously.
- Route: Model routing · Per-mission selection based on risk + cost class.
- Pin: Pin model versions.
- Fallback: Provider fallback · Multi-provider failover with SLA-aware retry.
- Cap: Cost caps · Per-mission and per-tenant token + compute ceilings.
- Evaluate: Evaluation + monitoring · Continuous evals: bias, drift, capability, regressions.
How model use is governed.
Every model call on a mission passes through the same four controls, in this order.
-
Model routing
Per-mission selection based on risk + cost class.
-
Provider fallback
Multi-provider failover with SLA-aware retry.
-
Cost caps
Per-mission and per-tenant token + compute ceilings.
-
Evaluation + monitoring
Continuous evals: bias, drift, capability, regressions.
Trust posture, in five lines.
The same five lines run along every Engyn trust page. They are collected here so you can read them in one place.
- armed · 0 breaches ytd
- soc 2 · iso 27001 · nist ai rmf · hipaa · gdpr
- hardware-token gates · 412 audits / hour
- tenant isolation · cryptographic boundaries
- replayable decisions · tamper-evident ledger
Change the mission. Watch the route change.
A sample router. Set the mission's risk and cost class, take a provider down, and see which pinned model the mission gets and where its spend stops.
Routed to model B on provider 1. Version pinned.
Start a Software Factory pilot.
Connect one repository, one ticketing tool, and one mission. See evidence in days, not quarters.